However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around May 16, 2016, when the Defendant was walking along a drunken path in front of Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Masan City, where 112 reported that measures for the protection of persons with disabilities are necessary, the Defendant said that the Defendant was called “the victim E of the police officer affiliated with D District District of the Agsan Police Station D, where 10 persons, who had taken measures for the protection of persons with disabilities C in a mental delay, and the victim E of the police officer affiliated with D District of the Agsan Police Station, who had taken measures for the protection of persons with disabilities, and 10 persons, whose name is in secret, have been observed, the Defendant said that “the person must not be bitched, chewing, and the bitch must not be known in the Republic of Korea, and the bitch must be left in the Republic of Korea.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in the above paragraph 1, continuously took a bath against the police officer E as above, was sleeped with the Defendant’s hand, who was requested from the security guard F of the said D District, who was taking protective measures against the said Party E, to stop the bath.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Articles 311 and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of insult) and 136 (1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60 (3) of the Juvenile Act, Article 60 of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. Sentencing Criteria for obstructing the performance of official duties (Scope of recommended punishment) and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing) of the basic area;

2. Each of the crimes in this case committed on the sentence of sentence may be deemed to have been committed with a view to and assaulting a police officer who is duly performing official duties.