2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court, taking into account the favorable circumstances favorable to the Defendant, determined the penalty by reducing the fine amount of the summary order (20 million won), and there is no new circumstance to change the sentence of the lower court in the first instance court.

In addition, comprehensively taking into account the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, living environment, motive for the crime, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records (in the case of being tried together with the crime for which the judgment became final and conclusive, consideration of equity in the case of being tried), the sentence imposed by the court below is conducted within the reasonable scope of discretion, and is not hot.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.