beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.09.11 2020고단5066

보험사기방지특별법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on December 27, 2019, for the crime of occupational breach of trust, etc. in the Goyang Branch of the District Court on December 19, 2019, and the judgment was finalized on December 27, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

From March 15, 2017 to November 18, 2018, Defendants jointly operated automobile luminous companies with the trade name “D” in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and Defendant A operated the said companies solely from November 19, 2018.

1. The Defendants, while operating D, conspired to issue a false glass construction guarantee to the damaged insurance companies, as if they were a vehicle with no free-riding construction work prior to a traffic accident, with respect to a vehicle or a vehicle with no free-riding construction guarantee that does not make profits by only a motor vehicle luminous ray or a detailed car, or for which the guarantee period of a free-riding construction guarantee has expired.

Accordingly, the Defendants put a letter on the D website "repair of a vehicle involved in an accident" and directed the borrower of the accident to make a false statement to the insurance company as a vehicle that had been engaged in a glass-rating construction before the accident occurred, and the Defendant B, as a consideration, took charge of the role of executing a glass-rating on the vehicle involved in the accident or providing luminous services, and Defendant A, as a result, took charge of the role of preparing a false glass-free construction guarantee in the name of “E” or “E” and claiming insurance proceeds to the insurance company.

The Defendants, at D office around April 22, 2017, prepared one copy of quality assurance statement stating “F string: MastststmW”, “F”, and “F : E” as if the Defendants, even though they had not constructed a glass string before the accident occurred, even though they had not completed the glass strawing in E, before the accident occurred, and on the same day.