However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court, and on February 21, 2011, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 4 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On May 30, 2014, at around 23:23:23, the Defendant driven B Mit car with approximately 500 meters alcohol concentration 0.163% under the influence of alcohol on the section of approximately 500 meters from the front day of the Kyang-dong Foreign Exchange Bank to the front day of the same Sinyang-dong Busan Elementary School.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Inquiry about the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Records before judgment: Application of criminal records, repeated statements, and copies of each summary order;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 12 years prior to the lapse of 12 years, including the fact that a person has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a sound driving, etc.; the details and frequency of the punishment of the same kind of crime; the fact that there are other family members to provide support;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Consideration into consideration in discretionary mitigation);

1. Article 62-2 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on Probation;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, the main sentence of Article 59 (1) of the Act on Probation, etc.;