beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2015.05.01 2015노25

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)등

Text

Defendant

In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment (the first crime: imprisonment with prison labor for three years and the remaining crimes in the holding: 12 years) imposed by the court below on the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment on the grounds of appeal. The crime of this case committed by the defendant. The defendant committed the crime of this case is likely to have a very negative impact on the future growth process and social life, and the victims who have an obligation to prevent them from protecting and raising the aged victims, and committed assaulting and injuring the victims who have been aged under the same circumstance as the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the court below, and it is necessary to cope with socially strict and simple measures as sexual assaulting the victims who have been aged continuously over a long time. The defendant's crime seems to have suffered serious physical and mental pain as the victims have not been established sexual identity. It appears that such damage is difficult to recover easily, and it appears that it would have a very negative effect on the victim's future growth process and social life, and considering all the sentencing conditions in the oral proceedings of this case including the fact that the victims want severe punishment and isolation of the defendant for a long time, it is considered that the defendant has made a statement in favor of the defendant in the criminal facts of this case and there is no sufficient statement and punishment for the defendant.

Even if the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

I would like to say.

[Defendants] The original mistake of facts or misapprehension of the legal principles, respectively.