The punishment of the lower court (one million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. The lower court, based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated, stated that the victim was at the time of the victim’s oral statement that it is difficult to be seen as a superior to the victim’s face, and that the victim was at the time of drinking (see, e.g., evidence records), ② the victim and the victim, consistently with the investigative agency, stated that “the victim was at the time of the victim’s oral statement (referring to the defendant).” On the other hand, the Defendant’s oral statement was highly reliable because he did not know about the Defendant’s daily behavior, ③ the Defendant was at the time of drinking, and only at the police station, who was first put in time of drinking, could not memory his behavior, and ④ the witness of the lower court was at the time of the victim’s oral statement to the effect that it was difficult for the victim to see that the victim was at the time of the victim’s oral statement, and that the victim was at the time of the victim’s oral statement to the effect that he did not have any other evidence.