강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable in light of the fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in the sentencing, etc., the sentence of the lower court (6 months of imprisonment, one year of suspended sentence, and 40 hours of an order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture) is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for the same crime.
However, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant’s indecent act by force, such as kisk and buckbucks against the her ageed victim, and attempting to have dancing, and the nature of the crime is not good. The victim appears to have suffered sexual humiliation and mental pain. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not make any effort to recover the victim’s damage, and taking into account the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior and environment, and other factors of sentencing as indicated in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., the Defendant’s punishment against the Defendant is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.