However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From March 21, 2012 to a director in charge of accounting affairs at D Co., Ltd. on the third floor of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the building of the company, the Defendant was working for the director in charge of accounting affairs, and there was no consent from E or F, the representative director of the company of the above company, to prepare a letter of conduct, and the above company did not lend money to the above company, notwithstanding the fact that there was no lending of money to the above company, the Defendant of a private document forgery of a private document is a borrowed amount on November 23, 2012 by using the computer of the above office of the company as a financial director and managing the account and the seal of the company of the above company.

Of the above amounts, the wage and retirement pay is 96,116,140 per cent, u u6,140 u u6,16, and u u6,000 u u6,000,000 won per cent of the total sum of KRW 152,116,140 per cent of the total sum of KRW 56,000 per cent of the total sum of the amounts of KRW 152,16,140 per cent of the total sum of the above amounts. The loan amounts is 56,00,000.

After the payment of the terms "E" was made out of a letter of commitment, "D Representative E, a representative director E," and affixed the corporate seal impression which was kept in advance next to the name of E.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged two copies of the payment under the name of D Co., Ltd., a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On January 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) filed a lawsuit seeking the return of a loan to the effect that, “The Daegu District Court Branch of Kimcheon-si, 39, Kimcheon-si, which was located in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant, as the Defendant, had been in office as a financial director of the said company; and (b) there was a details deposited into the corporate account using the Defendant’s account; and (c) “The Defendant lent KRW 84,000,000 to the Defendant on September 30, 2012 as the maturity date; (d) the Defendant did not fully pay the Plaintiff the principal amount of KRW 84,00,000 and interest late payment,” and (d) on May 8, 2013, the Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking the return of a loan with the court.