폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. At around 20:20 on March 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) found the victim’s house in the Gyeonggi Do 20:20 on the same day; (b) found the victim’s house in the Gyeonggi Do 20:20; and (c) stated that the victim “the victim would return to the bar”; (d) stated that the victim “the victim would die.” (e.g., that the victim would die.), and (e) took the victim’s bath view twice, and assaulted the victim by threateninging the victim to the effect that the victim would die, and that the victim would die.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, a written agreement was submitted on April 11, 2014, which was subsequent to the institution of the instant indictment that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant, and thus, the instant indictment was dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.