At around 22:00 on June 3, 2019, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol together with the victim D (the 34 years of age) who is a member of the workplace of drinking alcohol, had the face of the victim several times in his/her hand while fighting at the body of the vehicle, lost his/her awareness by taking the victim's face into the floor one time while fighting at the body of the vehicle, and caused danger to life by walking the victim three times at the face of the victim used on the floor, which requires approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

Article 258(1) of the Criminal Code applicable to the criminal facts of the CCTV Act applicable to the defendant's legal statement E, written diagnosis of the police statement of the defendant, and written diagnosis of the police statement of the D on-site CCTV records: The scope of the punishment under the sentencing guidelines for 1 to 10 years: The scope of the punishment [the decision of type] under the general injury [the special person] of serious injury (the scope of the recommendations and recommendations] - the aggravated factor: the aggravated factor: the defendant has a history of repeatedly committing various crimes, such as special rape, etc., and the defendant has a history of repeatedly sentenced to the punishment, and even during the suspended sentence period for which he is required to take care, he used again to relieve the face of the victim, who is a worker who has drinking alcohol, for the same time during the period of imprisonment with prison labor, and caused a serious risk to life again for the victim's face.

The possibility of criticism is very high in light of the criminal records, the background of crimes, the harsh number of laws and significant results, the relationship with the victim, etc.

In addition, the victim still has a bad health condition to the extent that it is difficult to lead a normal social life due to the legacy of this case (if the victim was unable to receive proper treatment in light of the degree and degree of injury at the time, it would have reached a written death). Nevertheless, the defendant reflects the instant case and uses the letter to the victim.