양수금
1. The plaintiff successor's application for intervention shall be dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed.
3...
1. According to the records of this case, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the grounds for the claim and the reasons for participation (Provided, That “creditor” shall be “Plaintiff” and “debtor” shall be “Defendant”, respectively.
2. Determination
A. The third party who has succeeded to the whole or part of the right or obligation which is the object of the lawsuit while the lawsuit is pending in the court regarding the application for intervention by the plaintiff's successor is entitled to file an application for succession with the court in which the lawsuit is pending (Article 81 of the Civil Procedure Act). The time when the lawsuit is pending is when a duplicate of the complaint has been served on the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 94Da12517, 94Da12524, Nov. 25, 1994, etc.). Since the plaintiff's successor acquired the claim of this case from the plaintiff before the duplicate of the complaint is served on the defendant (the time when the complaint is served on October 13, 2020; the time when the complaint is served on September 16, 2020); and the participation by the plaintiff's successor is an incidental law.
B. As to the plaintiff's claim, the plaintiff transferred the claim of this case to the plaintiff's successor, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.
3. As such, the plaintiff's motion to join the plaintiff's successor is unlawful. Thus, the plaintiff's motion is dismissed. Since the plaintiff's motion is without merit, it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.