However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 07:09 on March 16, 2020, the Defendant driven a bnding car and proceeded to the Seo-gu Bnding side of the Jildong Administrative Welfare Center according to the roads in front of the Daejeon U.S., the Defendant: (a) was negligent in ascertaining whether there is a pedestrian crossing where a signal, etc. is installed; (b) inasmuch as there is a pedestrian crossing where a signal, etc. is installed, it was possible to reduce the speed; and (c) failing to perform the duty of care to safely drive the vehicle according to the new code, failing to neglect the fact that the vehicle is changed to a stop signal; and (d) the Defendant sustained the victim’s physical part of the victim E’s body part of the said bnd part of the said bndr of the said bnding car; and (d) caused the victim by the injury, such as a confrating the road necessary for treatment for about 8 weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents and investigation reports (victim E telephone conversations);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes for the Investigation Report (Scambling Video Confirmation);

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Alternative Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; Selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on probation;

1. An order to attend a course shall be ruled as ordered by the reason of not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;