모욕
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:40 on 14:40 on the charges, on the ground that the victim D, who had been working in the community office of the above apartment complex, was informed the Defendant of the fact that the victim D, who had been working in the above apartment complex, had an infinitely been informed of the Defendant; and (b) in the majority of other employees and prospective occupants, the Defendant did not have “sals, finites, and
Doese, Doz.;
D. The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring “I shall not have to take care of it.”
2. Dismissal of public prosecution for determination
(a) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 313 (1) of the Criminal Act;
B. On November 15, 2017, after institution of a public prosecution, a statement of withdrawal of a complaint filed by the complainant;
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;