When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 27, 2016, the Defendant reported that “in Cheongyang-gun B, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun, Cheongyang-gun on October 27, 2016,” the Defendant: “A police officer assigned to the Cheongyang Police Station C District, who was sent to the site after receiving a report that “I had been frightd;” and “A police officer assigned to the site.”

h. The subjects at issue, i.e., the head of the gue, the head of both gue, and the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the head of n.e., the tax and the tax.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes on site photographs, screen pictures CDs, and the site photographs of the case;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, requires a strict punishment to commit the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; however, confession, depth, and reflects the nature; and the Defendant appears to have committed any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol, taking into account that the degree of assault was not severe.

In this context, the defendant's age, sex, family environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.