2. The plaintiff A's claim added and expanded in the trial.

2. The plaintiffs' claim against defendant D

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that Defendant D had conspired with Defendant E while working as an employee of the Agricultural Cooperatives, voluntarily terminated the plaintiff's installment savings, voluntarily withdrawn the plaintiff's deposit from the plaintiff's account, and on October 17, 2002, and December 18, 2002, Defendant D made a statement to the effect that "A, at the time of making a statement to the police on March 20, 1996, made an application by A. At the time of making a statement to the effect that "A, as at the time of making a statement, made a false statement to the effect that "A, as at the time of making a statement to the guarantor, confirmed the guarantor, and made a loan of KRW 30 million,00,000,000 to KRW 24 copies of the check, and KRW 5.1 million,00,000,000 to KRW A, 90,000,00 to KRW 28,000,00,000 to be a witness in cash."

Therefore, Defendant D is jointly and severally liable with Defendant E for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs due to the above tort committed by Defendant D.

B. Determination 1) First of all, it is difficult to recognize that Defendant D conspired with Defendant E to perform the above act, as seen below, as to the assertion that Defendant D conspired with Defendant E to terminate the Plaintiff’s installment savings deposit, and voluntary withdrawal from the deposit, as seen below, it is difficult to find that Defendant D committed the above act. The evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs, including the written evidence in Articles 22, 23, and 28, as well as the evidence submitted by the Plaintiffs, is insufficient to deem that Defendant D committed a tort as alleged by the Plaintiffs in collusion with or independently with Defendant E, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently. 2) Next, Defendant D’s investigation agency and investigation agency.