2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

A. Defendant B was not an expert in futures option investment because the period of investment in futures option is less than two months, but was not an expert in futures option investment. On April 30, 2006, when the Plaintiff was aware of in-house teachers under the name of Appointer F while making an investment in the futures option, Defendant B received money from the Plaintiff on April 30, 2006, including the Plaintiff’s 0th of the total amount of money 10% of the total amount of money transferred from 00,000,000 won to 30,000,000,000,000 won and 10,000,000 won and 10,000,00 won and 10,000,00 won and 10,000,00 won and 10,000,00 won and 30,000,00 won and 10,000,00 won and 20,00 won.

B. On July 17, 2006, Defendant B made an investment in futures option amounting to KRW 200,000,000,000, which was remitted by the Plaintiff, in the “P”-type book located in Gangnam-gu Seoul J on July 17, 2006, Defendant B made a false statement to the Plaintiff, stating that “Wents would have made profits equivalent to KRW 4,30,000,00,000,” and caused the Plaintiff to remit KRW 71,80,000,000 to the Korean bank account of Q, which is the business office selling benz vehicles on August 13, 2006, and acquired KRW 20,000,000 in the above account in the name of the designated person on the 14th of the same month, and received KRW 20,000,000 in total over two occasions.

C. As to the facts constituting the crime described in the above A through B, Defendant B.