However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 2016, the Defendant, at the entrance of the “slun apartment house” located in 10, Dokdong-ro, Busan, Busan, on April 20, 2016, at around 112, the Defendant paid a taxi fee from a slope affiliated with the Busan, Police Station B, and received a request for returning home after receiving a report that the passenger does not occur in the taxi. B, the Defendant, “Ik-do-do-ri-do-ri-do-ri-do-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si

"Along with the face of the above C, it seems that it seems to be possible for him to take the face of the above C, and assaulted by breath with two descendants.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the dispatch of report 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement protocol with respect to C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The execution of imprisonment shall be postponed by taking into account the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] ; (b) there is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing] (the decision of sentence ] there is no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (c) there is no record of being punished due to interference with the performance of official duties; (d) the degree of interference with official duties is not more severe; and