Search and seizure stones (25cm x 16cm x 16cm ), stones (16cm x 13cm x 2cm ).

The Defendant is a couple who is legally married with the victim D (V, 43 years old), and continuously committed violence to the victim and his/her children since marriage. From May 2017 to May 2017, the Defendant was living separately from the victim since around 2017 when he/she was suspected of committing violence against the victim and his/her children.

On September 10, 2017, the Defendant, at around 16:10 on September 10, 2017, was faced with the victim’s mobile phone due to an international telephone due to the victim’s mobile phone. However, the Defendant continued to go back to the victim without confirming the details of the receipt of the aforementioned mobile phone and having suspicion of the victim even though he/she is suspected of having discovered the outing of the victim.

The recommendations were made.

However, the Defendant, as a result, failed to participate in the continuous suspicion against the victim, was able to kill the victim in a timely manner, and was able to gather stones ( approximately 25 cm wide, about 16 cm long) that are dangerous objects in the above, and putting the victim's back to the floor by forceing the victim's back the back water once, and then putting the victim's head and arms back on the floor, putting the victim's head and arms back on the above stones, putting the victim's hand on the hand, putting the victim's neck with the hand hand, breaking the stone into the victim's resistance, and putting the victim's neck on the victim's hand. "The liquor tax wres that is needed to kill the victim

“A string off the victim’s hand with his son who embling it, cutting his body into the bottom of a nearby slope by cutting off his body, cutting off the stone, which is a dangerous object at which the son was living there, and cutting off the stone ( approximately 16 cm in width, about 13 cm in length) and “A son of the same year during which the son was living.”

“In doing so, the victim’s face and head was taken several times.”

As a result, the Defendant attempted to kill the victim, but the police officers who received the report and the guards sent the victim to the above place, and did not commit an attempted crime, but failed to bring the victim to the hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Protocols of seizure;