유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the partial revision of the judgment of the first instance as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. As a result of the previous meetings of the inspection items, the following marks are put in line 8 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court of the year 497-40-99 (m/dL) with a high density of 166 1-129 (m/dL) of the standard scope as a result of the gold conference, a total call, 217 225 225 98-199 (m/dL) of low density of 166 1-129 (m/dL):
Of the 8th 11 through 13th 13th 13th of the judgment of the first instance court, the phrase “the blood 75 to 79 years old” was changed to read “the blood string of a little blood pressure (124/70mHg),” as a result of the cromosome test, the same crode index (CAVI Card Ankle Vasculex: 0-9 years old from the heart to the blood string, the standard scope: 0-9 years old from the blood string) 10.2 (the blood string of 75-79 years old from the blood string) / letter 8.2 (the blood string of 60-64 years old from the blood string) of the first instance court.”
As a result of the previous session of the inspection items, the following marks are put in place 8 pages 13 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance of the 164 1-129 (mg/dL) in a high density of 1664 164 1-129 (mg/dL) a high density of 47 51 51-99 (mg/dL) in the total call scope, 225, 241 98-19 (m/dL).
3. The decision of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.