However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 16:20 on April 17, 2019, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, on the ground that he/she performed alcohol together with the victim C(73 years of age) on the “Ekbook”, which is the flab of the victim C(73 years of age), and on the ground that the said victim changed his/her wage in the course of drinking, due to beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, and caused the above victim’s head at the time of the above victim’s head, such as the flab damage to the glab’s head and other parts requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant damaged the property owned by the said victim by throwing out a fire-fighting unit of 50,000 won in the market price owned by the victim D (n, 68 years old) who was located there on the floor due to the same reasons as the description in paragraph (1) at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the witness C, D, and F in this Court;

1. Statement C in the second suspect examination protocol (C and comparison) of the accused prepared by the police officer on the accused;

1. Each statement made by the police officer D and C of each statement;

1. Entry of each 112 Reporting Case Handling List in police preparation; and

1. Statement of a medical certificate of injury to C in the preparation of G G;

1. Determination on the assertion by each video defendant and defense counsel of the relevant photographs

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant did not have any fact when the head of the victim C was flicker, which is a dangerous thing, and only the victim D, who was in the middle of the dispute with the victim C, was broken away from the floor.

2. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court as seen earlier, namely, ① the victims, from the police to the court, consistently consistent from the police to the Defendant, to the head of the victim C with the beer’s disease, and the beer’s disease to the beer’s left part of the victim C was broken, and the beer’s beer’s beer’s beer’s beer.

Then, the defendant was victims C.