Seized evidence 1 or 2 shall be confiscated.

1. An employee of telecommunications fraud fraud in the name of fraud made it possible for an unspecified number of unspecified persons to transfer money to an account managed by a member of the Mediation Agency by deceiving the victim by means of the statement that he/she would make it possible to make a loan if he/she deposits money, and the Defendant conspired to defraud the victim by deceiving the victim by withdrawing the money deposited into the said account under the order of the said person without his/her name.

On March 2, 2017, an employee in charge of telecommunications fraud in name speaks to the effect that “A citizen bank D is an agent for a national bank, and if a person redeems the existing loan to the E company bank account, he/she will open a low interest maths passbook.” The Defendant waitings to withdraw the above money with the above E company bank account, when the victim deposited the money with the above E company bank account, while holding the e-mail card connected with the above E company bank account.

However, the above person was not an employee of the financial institution, and there was no intention or ability to open a low interest mathp passbook to the victim.

As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with the employees to engage in telecommunications fraud, by deceiving the victim, and received 4.2 million won from the victim to the above E company bank account (F) on the same day from the victim.

2. On March 2, 2017, the Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Electronic Financial Transactions Act”) at the 7th calendar calendars in Mapo-gu, Seoul, and the e-mail card (H) 1 and e-mail card (J) 1 connected to the new bank account in the name of G in which the amount of damage from the fraud is deposited from the non-name-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de-de