When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim C(50 years of age) are between Dong-dong and Dong-dong.

On September 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:15 on September 19, 2014, at E business establishments located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) while drinking alcohol with the victim C, the victim took a bath to female employees; (c) when the victim took a face of the Defendant due to drinking, she gets the victim up against him/her and her against him/her, and her flads and her chests and her chests, etc., the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim incurred a hole in snow on the far left side of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement (which constitutes self-defense);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Occurrence of an injury case, voluntary report on the suspect's conduct, investigation report (on-site conditions, etc.);

1. Application of investigation report (as to the suspect C's wife part), C Injury photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel on the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that since the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged in the process of defending the victim's assault, this constitutes a justifiable act

살피건대, 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 판시 증거에 의하면, 피고인은 피해자로부터 폭행을 당하자 이에 대항하여 피해자를 넘어뜨리고 서로 뒹굴며 싸우다가 일어나면서 누워 있던 피해자를 발로 찬 사실을 인정할 수 있는바, 위 인정사실에 의하면 피고인의 행위는 피해자의 부당한 공격을 방어하기 위한 것이라기 보다는 서로 공격할 의사로 싸우면서 피해자로부터 공격을 받고 이에 대항하여 가해하게 된 것이라고 보이고, 이와 같은 싸움의 경우 가해행위는 방어행위인 동시에 공격행위의 성격을 가지므로 정당방위에...