One (No. 4) shall be forfeited from the seized mobile phone.

피고인은 중국 국적의 조선족으로, 중국에 있는 전화금융사기단(일명 ‘보이스피싱’ 조직)의 일원으로 보이는 성불상 ‘D’으로부터 속칭 ‘대포통장’과 현금카드, 카드비밀번호 등을 모집ㆍ전달ㆍ수거하는 일을 해달라는 제의를 받고서, 중국판 메신저 서비스인 ‘위챗(WeChat)’을 통하여 위 ‘D’으로부터 지시를 받으면 건물 우편함에 보관되어 있는 속칭 대포통장 등을 수거하고 이를 지정된 장소에 전달하는 일을 하기로 하였다.

Accordingly, no person may take over a means of access, such as a cash card or its password, which is a means or information used to make a transaction request in electronic financial transactions or to secure the authenticity and accuracy of users and the details of such transaction, even if it is not a means of access

1. On January 30, 2015, at the Fudio Hostel located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 30, 2015, G receives one copy of the check card connected to the account of the national bank (H) in the name of G that G sent by using delivery services;

2. At around 20:05 on the same day, at the same place, I received a physical card connected to the I’s account in the name of the Agricultural Cooperative (J) that I sent by using delivery services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. G statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. 수사보고(위챗 캡쳐화면 첨부건) 법령의 적용

1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation;