Seized evidence 1 to 12 shall be confiscated.

As a member of the Bosing Organization, the person under whose name the victim was named was the victim of a large number of unspecified victims by calls, under the pretext of a substitute loan, and deposited the amount of damage into the large account designated by them under the pretext of the repayment of the existing loan, and the person under whose name the victim was named was planned to commit the crimes of Bosing under the applicable law to receive the amount of damage by withdrawing the amount of damage deposited into the large account through the withdrawal method in cash and making it deposited into another large account.

피고인은 2019. 8. 중순경 지인의 소개로 성명불상자(위챗 대화명 ‘B’)를 알게 되어, 성명불상자로부터 ‘카드를 받아서 돈을 찾아 송금해주면, 해당 금액의 2%를 지급하겠다’는 제안을 받고 2019. 8. 27. 일을 시작하여, 성명불상자의 보이스피싱 범행에 인출책으로 가담할 것을 순차 공모하였다.

1. Fraud;

A. On August 26, 2019, the person who was unaware of the name of the crime committed against the victim C by phoneing to the victim C on August 26, 2019 and making a false statement to the effect that “the person who was unaware of the name of the victim is a Dg Capital employee, who is an employee of the company in the name of the company in the name of the company in the name of the name of the beneficiary of the same day (F)” was paid KRW 6,00,000 from the victim to the E-bank account in the name of the beneficiary of the same day (H) and received KRW 6,810,000 from the victim, KRW 8,800,000, KRW 5,700,000 from the E-bank account in the name of the bearer on the same day (I), and KRW 6,000,000 from August 27, 2019 to the account of the company in the name of the beneficiary of the name (J).

At around 16:10 on August 28, 2019, the Defendant continued to withdraw KRW 6,000,000 in cash using the above K’s check (P) connected to the account under the name of the person who was in possession of the said K’s name in accordance with the direction of the person who was unable to receive his/her name at the O point of the L bank located N at the time of e.g., the Defendant deposited it into the large account designated by the person who was unable to receive the name

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with the injured party in name.