beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.13 2017가합1338

임대차보증금반환

Text

1. The defendant shall pay KRW 45,00,000 for each of the plaintiffs (appointed parties) A, Appointed B, C, D, and E, F, and G, respectively. 47,000,000 for each of them.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Plaintiff (designated parties, hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) and the remaining designated parties, other than the Plaintiff, concluded a lease agreement with the Defendant on the Ltel of Bupyeong-gu Incheon (hereinafter “instant building”) as indicated in the following table, and around that time, they paid the lease deposit to the Defendant.

(1) The court below's selection of 25,00 won out of 45,00,000 won, 20,000 won, 20,000 won, 40,000 won, 20,000 won, 40,000 won, 20,000 won, 40,000 won, 20,000 won, 40,000 won, 20,000 won, 20,000 won, 40, 60, 60, 40, 60, 20, 205, 20, 30,000 won, 20, 40,000 won, 5,000 won, 20,000 won, 30,00,000 won, 20,05, 20,000 won, 64, 205, 2014, 206,0

B. On April 9, 2012, the instant building had been voluntarily decided to commence auction on April 9, 2012, and the Plaintiff and the remaining designated parties were aware of the progress of auction after the completion period to demand a distribution, and did not receive a deposit for lease, and did not receive a payment for the deposit, and did not specify the lease object to the successful bidder of the leased object.

C. Accordingly, the remaining designated parties except the plaintiff and the plaintiff shall notify the defendant of the termination of the lease contract by serving the written complaint on him.

Therefore, the defendant is against the remaining designated parties except the plaintiff and the plaintiff.