Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the trade of middle-North Korea through the Internet without trade name.

around 21:00 on April 7, 2015, the Defendant purchased Samsung Industries, equivalent to KRW 1,200,000,000, from the victim F (38: South and North Korea) who owns stolen goods purchased from the purchaser of the same company from the purchaser of the same company in Jung-gu, Seoul.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of the Nowon-gu, has a duty to pay due care to check whether he/she is stolen by properly examining the details of acquiring the Nowon-gu, the process of acquiring the Nowon-gu, the confirmation of the password, whether he/she is stolen to the Center for Manufacturing Services, and demanding reasonable prices in the transaction prices.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to pay the above attention and neglected to judge the stolen water, but acquired the stolen goods by purchasing the above Nowon-gu amounting to 400,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. A written statement;

1. The criminal place;

1. Report of investigation (specific suspect);

1. Investigation report (as to the transfer of seized articles),

1. Reporting of investigation results;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Article 364 of the Criminal Act, Articles 362 (1) and 362 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines concerning the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;