(a) deliver 127.24 square meters per floor among the buildings listed in the attached list;

B. From December 21, 2015, the foregoing.

A. 1) Determination as to the cause of the claim 1) In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 6, and 9 (including paper numbers), the Plaintiff, the owner of the building listed in the attached list, as the owner of the building listed in the attached Table, is 127.24 square meters of the first floor among the above buildings

(2) On August 13, 2013, the Defendant submitted a preparatory document stating that the above lease contract was terminated on the ground of the rent delay on March 18, 2016 and delivered it to the Defendant on March 22, 2016, and that the above preparatory document was delivered to the Defendant on March 2016, the period from August 21, 2013 to August 20, 2015, and the above store was leased and delivered to the Defendant, and the Defendant was in arrears with three or more times as of March 22, 2016, and the Plaintiff submitted a preparatory document stating that the above lease contract was terminated on the ground of the rent delay on March 18, 2016, it is apparent in the record that the above provisional document was delivered to the Plaintiff on March 22, 2016, and thus, the Defendant’s obligation to deliver the above lease contract to the Plaintiff on March 20, 2016 as of March 21, 2016.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim to pay rent from July 21, 2015 to December 20, 2015 is without merit.

As to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserted that the above lease agreement was implicitly renewed after the expiration of the original term of the agreement and extended to August 20, 2017, and that the Plaintiff did not perform its duty to provide the site for the parking lot necessary for the use of the store of this case as the lessor, thereby failing to comply with the Plaintiff’s claim.

However, the store of this case.