If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant, on September 16, 2017, attempted to assault female employees in front of D’s main points located in D at the time of strike around 00:26 on September 16, 2017.

“A victim of the F police station of the Pakistan who was dispatched upon the report of 112 to the effect that it is required by the F police station G to present an identification card for the purpose of investigating the details and contents of the report, and whether the victim is a bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit son, the police,

In this regard, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by referring to the hyp and hys "the hyp".

B. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the above date, at the above place, and at the above time and place, took a bath to the funeral G, and heard from the funeral G the phrase “the liquor tax on an identification card that he does not take a bath.” The Defendant was on the chest G’s chest.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby hindering police officers from performing their legitimate duties on the handling of reported cases.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant, at the date, time, place, and at the time, place specified in paragraph 1, and at the victim G for the victim’s warning G to arrest a flagrant offender under suspicion of insult and interference with the performance of official duties due to the foregoing reasons, including H and I, and persons who engage in such activities, provided, that the Defendant “it is necessary for these weatherpers to grow up in the same kind, and the victim’s judgment is given.”

The franchis typ typ sexually insulting the victim by openly citing “the flue”.

B. The Defendant, at the above date and place, continuously arrested A as a suspicion of insult and interference with the performance of official duties, led the shoulder part of G by hand.

As a result, the defendant assaulted police officers, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties on handling reported cases and arresting flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Investigation report (on-site verification and ctv verification) and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen by reporting an investigation (ctV analysis) and by capturing CCTV video images;

1. Criminal facts;