However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, under the trade name of “B”, was a person who carried out the sales team of the building outside the building, and from around 2009, due to financial difficulties, the monthly expenditure, such as personnel expenses, material expenses, loan interest, etc., and the total amount of national taxes and personal debts exceeded KRW 200 million.

1. Around January 21, 2010, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay rent after one month” to the victim while leasing one (11 meter in the highest work height) from the “E company” in the operation of the victim C at a factory located in Gu, Si, Gu, Si, Gu, and Gu. D.

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the rent normally even if the Defendant leased and used the above work group from the victim because it was in excess of the obligation as above.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and using one of the above accusation units from the victim, did not pay rent of KRW 660,00,000, and acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount as the victim did not pay the said rent. From June 21, 2010 to June 21, 2010, the Defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 5,754,100 in total by deceiving the victim by the same method, from June 21, 2010.

2. On October 12, 2010, the Defendant, who committed the crime against the Victim F, leased 2 vehicles (14 meters high, 11.3 meters high, 14 meters) from the International Company for the Operation of the Victim F at the Construction Site of New H Company in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and paid the Victim Fee immediately after the lease period expires.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, the Defendant had no intention or ability to pay the rent normally even if the Defendant leased and used the above work group from the victim because it was in excess of the obligation as above.

As above, the Defendant deceivings the victim, and thereby deceiving him from the victim on January 2, 2011.