2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Around July 2009, the Defendant received a proposal from Vietnamese Women D and E to make a disguised marriage with D in spite of the fact that the Defendant had no intention to marry with Vietnams D in spite of the absence of a genuine intention to marry with Vietnams D.

On September 24, 2009, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement of marriage as if a genuine marital will exists; (b) made a public official in charge of the above family registry enter the false statement of marriage into the family registry information system as if the Defendant and D were married; (c) made a false report to a public official; (d) made the public official in charge of the above family registry enter the false facts into the family registry information system, which is a public electronic record; and (e) exercised a false public electronic record by preserving the above public electronic record stating the false fact of marriage at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Family relation certificate (A), marriage relation certificate (A), application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning marriage registration;

1. Relevant Article 228 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229, 228 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment for each of them;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (i.e., the violation and circumstances leading to the commission of a crime);