However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 14:00 on October 13, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court Decision 2016Kadan17902, Oct. 13, 2017) and took an oath on the violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (Disclosure of Business Secrets, etc.) against 2016Kadan1790 B, etc.

The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that “B disclosed trade secrets of Co., Ltd., such as the dyp design drawing, and inflicted property damage equivalent to the value of trade secrets,” and the Defendant was working for Co., Ltd (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”) by May 20, 2015, and was given testimony as to the facts that he/she managed and developed the dyplate as trade secrets at the time of his/her employment.

Thus, the defendant testified in the presiding judge's interrogation that "I have never developed this case from January 2015 to May 20 of the withdrawal of the witness," that "I have testified to "I have never tried to do so once", "I have never started the development process by May 20," and "I have testified to "I have no way to do so" by the presiding judge, "I have no way to start the development process by May 20," and "I have no way to keep the main contents on the part of the prosecutor's "I have no way to keep the security rules thoroughly," and "I have no way to keep the main contents on the part of the prosecutor's "I have no way to do this."

However, the defendant is working in C on March 17, 2015 and is at a meeting related to the development of part.