However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On March 7, 2018, the Defendant intruded into the building managed by the victim by entering the said office for the purpose of moving away from that time to October 7, 2018, from that time, the wooden door was opened up to the 5th floor rooftop office of the victim D management in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu.

2. On October 5, 2018, around 02:30 on October 5, 2018, the Defendant, who attempted to larceny upon a night structure and intrusion on a structure at night, removed nine drinking water owned by the victim who was in a drinking water cooling house and a tent in Songpa-gu Seoul, and cut off nine drinking water from the strings, cut off the entrance to the display stand, cut off the 4-hand cigarette owned by the victim, and cut off the 2-wing bars from March 2018 to October 6, 2018, and then stolen the victim’s property at least 141,950 won in total at night, as indicated in the list of crimes committed in the attached Form, and then stolen the victim’s property or attempted the victim’s property at least four times in total,950 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written statement of G and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (CCTV investigation);

1. Relevant Article 330 of the Criminal Act (a thief by intrusion on a structure at night), Articles 342 and 330 of the Criminal Act (a person who attempts to larceny a structure at night) concerning the crime, and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (a person who intrudes on a structure at night);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is committed by intrusion upon a structure at night, thereby repeating the larceny crime. It is unfavorable that the nature of the crime is not good.

However, there is no space in which the defendant is living, and there is no significant amount of theft damage, and the defendant recognizes the facts charged.