When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 16:50 on December 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) saw the victim C’s D restaurant operated in Busan Metropolitan City, and saw the victim’s words “fluoring.........................................” the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to read “the year in which the city is made fluoring down,” and prevented the victim from entering the restaurant for about two hours, such as fluoring the fluoring of the victim’s face, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Although the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, there was a history that the defendant was punished several times for the same kind of crime, the fact that the investigative agency recognized the instant crime, such as the fact that the damage is relatively minor, and other favorable circumstances such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, and all other conditions of sentencing such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, motive or circumstance before and after the crime shall be determined as ordered by the order