beta
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.02.18 2013고단3361

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등

Text

Defendant

A, B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of KRW 2,00,000.

Defendant

D. The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A provided speculative and speculative acts. Defendant A: (a) installed a 30-ray 1,400-meter range from “F” located under the 1st floor of Songpa-gu Seoul E building, Songpa-gu, for speculation, along with a 1,400-meter range from “F”; (b) Defendant B and Defendant C managed employees as the head of the office; and (c) Defendant D conspired to operate the said F by sharing the role of cleaning and cleaning, etc. with employees.

From July 26, 2013 to July 16, 2013, the Defendants offered an unspecified number of customers with a multi-user image machine installed in the above F from July 31, 2013 to July 16, 200, and provided them with a right to use cash from customers, and let customers play games by inserting the above right to use in a multi-user image machine.

The Defendants selected a game method, such as a single-class ceremony for customers to anticipate the horses of the first class, and a tobacco ceremony for predicting the horses of not more than the third class, and let them betting point to not more than 50 points, and if winning, the Defendants offered points according to the dividend rate, but if not won, the points in betting have reduced.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use machines, etc. that are likely to instigate speculative spirit to give financial benefits or losses to the users according to the incidental outcome, and at the same time, the game providing business operator did not let the users perform speculative acts using game products or let them do so.

2. No one who violates the rating classification shall provide game products for the distribution or use, or display or keep for such purposes, the contents of which are different from the contents of the rating classification obtained by the Game Rating Committee;

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to do so at the same time and place as Paragraph 1.