beta
(영문) 창원지방법원진주지원 2014.09.03 2013가합1665

토지인도 등

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall enter the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) in the attached list as to the 1,486 square meters of the 1,486 square meters in Sacheon-si.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A. On June 7, 2002, in order to construct a building on the ground of 1,486 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by A, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, I enter into a lease agreement with A on the part of 702 square meters in the ship connected with each of the above points of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 2 in sequence among the above land (hereinafter “the instant building site”), and newly constructed a steel-frameylllled one-story neighborhood living facilities of 408.7 square meters (hereinafter “the instant building”). On June 7, 2002, the above building was registered for preservation of ownership on the above building on the ground.

B. Upon the termination of the above lease agreement between the ice contractor and A, the Defendant purchased the instant building from the ice contractor and owned the said building, and leased the instant building site from A on December 14, 2003 to KRW 50,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,800,000 (payment on May 5), from February 14, 2003 to December 13, 2008 (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”), and purchased the said building from the ice contractor on December 20, 203 to operate the electronic equipment agency (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”), and subsequently registered the ownership of the said building on December 30, 203. < Amended by Act No. 7003, Dec. 30, 2003>

C. On December 30, 2003, according to the instant lease agreement, A entered into a registration for establishment of chonsegwon (hereinafter “registration for establishment of chonsegwon of this case”) with the Changwon District Court Decision No. 29723, Dec. 30, 2003, which was received on December 30, 2003, with respect to the land of this case, as the deposit deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000,000, within the scope of the land, the entire duration of the land, from December 14, 2003 to December 13, 2008; and D.

The instant lease agreement has been implicitly renewed even after the expiration of the contract term, and A notified on June 24, 2013 that the said lease agreement was terminated to the Defendant, and the said notification reached the Defendant around that time.

E. A shall continue the instant lawsuit on June 2014.