From July 12, 2015 to August 9, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed the account number in the name of the Party to have 20 million won borrowed at 4% per annum from the Korean team leader of Capital C (hereinafter “C”); (b) heard the phrase “Isman who sent inside the sexual water station and sent the money to the Defendant on August 12, 2015; and (c) around 10:0, around August 10, 2015, the Defendant opened the bank account under the name of the Defendant “Isman who sent the money in the name of the Party to obtain a loan of 10 million won per annum; and (d) opened the bank account under the name of the Defendant to receive the money from the Defendant’s “Isman who sent the money in the name of the Party to the Defendant’s account with the knowledge of the fact that Isman who sent the money to the Party to the Defendant’s account.”

On the other hand, at around 10:00 on August 12, 2015, the name influor of the cause of the Bosing organization, misrepresenting the public prosecutor and investigator of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office by telephone to the victim E, and “The extent of 45,00,000 won was involved in a crime committed under the name of the party and the passbook was traded, and it should be confirmed whether the party is the perpetrator or the victim, transfer the money recorded in the account under the name of the party to the designated account in whole, and then transfer the money from the victim to the account in the name of the defendant (F).” On the same day, the victim received from the victim KRW 39,00,000 from around 12:31 on the same day, around 13:55 on the same day, KRW 60,000,000,000,000 from around 13:55 on the same day.

Thus, the defendant, around 13:22 of the same day, withdrawn KRW 21 million from the central point of Cit Bank Cheong-ro, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, at the Sungsan-ro 143 (Sweak-dong 2) of Seongdong-gu, and around 14:47 of the same day at the 14:47 of the same day, at the pressure-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, at the Kit Bank Cheong-ro, 436 (Cheongdo-dong 2) and sent it to Da.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with a person who is not a name, acquired 60 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1...