If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

[2012 high-speed 875] On December 23, 2011, the Defendant, around 09:00 on December 23, 201, assaulted the victim D with regard to the case where the Defendant was punished by assaulting the people living on the fourth floor of the above house in the past, in relation to the case where the victim D did not have been a witness of the above case, and used the victim D with the desire to “Iskh and want to write the witness” without any special reasons to the victim D, and assaulted the victim D with a view to walking the part of the victim D’s spherb "Ish and to walk the part of the victim D’s spherb and face with the hand saw.

[2012 High Court Decision 981] Defendant,

1. On December 23, 2011, around 11:00, to the victim E, a police officer, who was called out after having received 112 report while disputing neighboring residents due to inter-floor noise problems in the Namyang-si Housing, the victim E, a police officer, who was called out after having received 112 report from the neighboring residents, “Wookkkk for a camping, police Chewing sark fort.

2. 2011. 12. 23. 12:00경 남양주시 F에 있는 G파출소에서 민원인들이 있는 자리에서 경찰관인 피해자 E에게 “야, 씹할 놈아, 경찰이 이따위로 하니깐 짭새 새끼라고 하지, 이 도둑놈들아!”라고,

3. On December 23, 201, at around 18:00 on December 23, 2011, the victim E, a police officer returning to Korea after completing his/her service in the street room run by the general public in front of the G police box located in the Namyang-si F, shall be deemed as follows: (i) whether the victim E, who was a police officer returning to Korea after completing his/her service, should be subject to death if he/she was fright, she would not have to go through, if he/she was frighten, she flap?

4. On December 24, 201, at around 21:20 on December 24, 201, G police boxes located in Namyang-si F, where civil petitioners exist, the victim E and H, a police officer, “I see, e.g., ice, e., e., e., g., e., e., bbbbbbbbbb, ba, and bal, e., e., or the victim E or the victim H by openly speaking in a large voice.”

Summary of Evidence

[2012 High Court Decision 875]

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Part concerning D's statement among the interrogation protocol of the police as to D

1. Photographs (2012 high-level 981);

1. The defendant's partial statement 1.1.