around 14:30 on February 10, 2017, the Defendant sent the victim’s house to Emb, the victim’s house located in Yangsan-si apartment, at the victim’s residence, 1,50,000 won of the market price of the victim’s house, 1,000 won of the market price, 1,000,000 won of the phone 6 (GB), 1,000,000 won of the market price, 1,0000,000 won of the market price, 50,000 won of the market price, 1,000,000 won of the 7,000,000,000 won of the BJ-based apartment, 1,000,000 won of the market price, and 3,00,000,000 won of the 3,000,000 won of the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. Six copies of a transport invoice;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the grounds for sentencing of the punishment of imprisonment, and the reasons for choosing the punishment;

1. The basic area (from June to June) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] for the larceny of general property (general larceny) (no person who has any special sentencing factor];

2. The fact that the Defendant, who was sentenced to the sentence, led the victim to a confession from the investigative agency and returned the damaged goods to the victim is favorable to the Defendant. However, the Defendant, after having access to the person who was her natives and has obtained assistance, has committed a crime of extremely bad nature of escape.

Even if a detention warrant was dismissed, the circumstances after the crime are not very good, such as escape.

Criminal records of the same kind are reasonable.

Considering these circumstances, the sentence of the defendant is to be imposed, and the above circumstances are considered in the recommended sentence according to the above sentencing guidelines, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive of crime, etc. is added.