Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for two years after the judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 29, 2018, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the same crime in the Daejeon District Court Hongsung Branch.

On January 4, 2020, at around 20:55, the Defendant driven a B B B sanon-car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.112% from the 15 km section to the road in front of the intersection road located in Saemangeum-gun, the Do in front of the breakwater in the city of Gun, the Do in front of the breakwater.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents, and the report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Evidence and photographs of the traffic accident scene;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment, etc. to the suspect's previous records and attachment);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: the fact that community service and lecture attendance order requires the elimination of the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; the degree of blood alcohol level; the fact that the defendant has been punished several times for a similar crime; the defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment in around 2007; the fact that the defendant has not committed a second offense; and other various factors for sentencing, including the defendant's age, family, health, occupation, environment, etc.