"2017 Highest 2712"

1. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant against the victim C would open a cellphone 7 smartphones up to the date of the payment, with the victim C (22 tax) through the Kakakao Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm Stockholm, at a place where it is unknown about the light place on March 22, 2017.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was subject to the disposition of business suspension from March 21, 2017 to March 31, 2017, and the Defendant thought that the money received from the victimized person was used as a sports Saturday, so even if he received money from the injured person, he did not have the intention or ability to open the phone 7 smartphone to send the money.

The Defendant, as above, got the victim, and 520,000 won was wired to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim.

2. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant against the victim D’s fraud: (a) deposited KRW 250,000 on deposit with the victim D(29 years of age) Kakao Stockholm dialogue at a place where the victim’s location is unknown.

3. up to 25. Dogal jus by opening 7 smartphones.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the Defendant was subject to the disposition of business suspension from March 21, 2017 to March 31, 2017, and the Defendant thought that the money received from the victimized party is used as a sports soil entertainment fund, so even if receiving money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to open a gallon 7 smartphone when receiving money from the injured party.

The Defendant, as above, got the victim, and 2,50,000 won was remitted to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim.

"2017 Highest 3697"

1. Fraud;

A. On April 2016, 2016, the Defendant lent KRW 10 million to the Victim F in Guro-gu Seoul E-9, and settled the price for goods to the company where the victim works, and used the remainder for the cost of living, and then repaid after three months.

“Falsely speaking to the effect that it is “......”

However, the defendant's intent or ability to pay the above money even if he borrows the money from the injured party.