beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.11.22 2018고단3438

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million on December 3, 2010 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), etc. on the support of the Suwon Friwon method, and on June 15, 2016, in addition to the issuance of a summary order of KRW 8 million for the same crime at the same court on June 15, 2016, the Defendant is a person with the same record more than once.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a D liquid sports cargo vehicle in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of approximately 0.134% from the 200-meter section from the 200-meter upper road of Ansan-si, Ansan-si to the same Si roads; (b) on July 13, 2018, the Defendant driven a D liquid cargo vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving at least twice under the influence of alcohol, was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. The Defendant violates the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a sports cargo vehicle of D amount.

On July 13, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 21:03, and made the left turn to the front of the E elementary school located in Ansan-gu, Jeonsan-si, Annsan-si, the left turn to the front of the park at the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the rear, and there was a place where the left turn to the left is allowed to be left at the intersection installed with the signal installed, and thus, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not look at the front side and left-hand turn at the left-hand side of the coast, and took the front part of the G SP car in the G SPP car in the 58-year-old G SP car, which was driven by the victim F (W, 58) who was left-hand from the left-hand side of the coast.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence for approximately two weeks to the victim.