When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On June 11, 2015, the Defendant sold a mobile phone on the Internet website.

The phrase "in fact, although it was posted, did not have the intention or ability to sell the goods, it was obtained 250,000 won from B to C account in the name of the defendant in a new bank in the name of the defendant.

2. On June 9, 2015, the Defendant sold a mobile phone on the Internet’s website around the world.

The phrase "in fact, although it was posted, it was not possible to sell the goods, it was obtained 400,000 won from D to the new bank account in the name of the defendant in the name of the defendant even though it was true.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to the respective petitions filed by B and D;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;