On June 9, 2014, at around 10:05, the Defendant driven the above vehicle and proceeded along a three-distance intersection at the entrance of art galleries in the calculation of the luminous ethrade in the Gyeonggi-Pak-si, depending on the side street, from the restaurant parking lot for the old Peded Day to the art gallery located in the calculation line.

Since there is a place where traffic is not controlled, in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle crossing by reducing the speed or temporarily suspending the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so by negligence and instead instead, received the front part of the instant car driving by the victim D(72 years of age) driving the said intersection from the luminous to the Government of the Republic of Korea in one way. The lower part of the top part in front of the left side of the E-Wing-In vehicle driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by its occupational negligence, approximately two weeks of injury to the above victim D, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of trees, and injury to the victim F (the son, the son, the son, and the 67 years of age) who is in need of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents cannot be prosecuted against the victim’

On March 18, 2015, the date of the prosecution of this case, the victims clearly stated that they would not want to be punished for the defendant by attending this court.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.