beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고합125

성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강제추행)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

To order the defendant to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On November 3, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Act by compulsion of persons with disabilities) committed an indecent act by force against the victim F (the age 28) with the victim F (the age 28), who was travelling the car at the Eda operated by D (the age 51) on November 17:20, 201, the Defendant took the car at the Eda operated by D (the age 51) under the ground of Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, by hand, took charge of the victim's chest on both hand, taken the victim's chest on his/her own, taken the victim's chest on his/her own, and returned to D, and made a report on his/her will only once on his/her chest.” While having a dispute with D, the Defendant forced the victim F to commit an indecent act by force against the victim F with the victim's chest on both hand at his/her own will.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) committed an indecent act against F at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and went out of Eda, again, found out in Eda, and detained the victim by acting as a dangerous weapon when the victim reported to D while gathering excessive (12 cm length, 25 cm in total length, 25 cm in Eda) as a deadly weapon at Eda bank, and taking the victim D's refusal to take the climb, and by carrying a deadly weapon. When the victim reported to D, he would have died of intending to take money. He would have salved his inner salved, sound, sound, etc. by carrying the deadly weapons by acting as a dangerous weapon when the victim reported to him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Any statement made by the defendant in a part appropriate for such statement in this Act;

1. The defendant's statement that the witness D had been in line with this in this court asserts that the defendant merely saw the victim F's arms, and that the chest did not appear.

D stated that the defendant had clearly observed that the victim F was the chest of the victim F, and the witness G was the strong vertebrate, and the victim F cannot be seen as the victim F. The defendant is the victim F.