When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Victim D is a person who constructs a new building in G and H adjacent to the land owned by E and the F apartment complex.

On January 22, 2015, between 10:30 and 12:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s work by force by obstructing the victim’s work by forcing the victim to enter the construction site at the victim’s work site in a way that he did not move the vehicle at the victim’s work site in a way that he did not move the vehicle for about one hour.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Documents to be submitted by the complainant (record, Nos. 3 and 9), documents to be submitted by the complainant (a copy of the decision of provisional disposition of interference with passage by the complainants) (a copy of the decision of provisional disposition of interference with passage by the complainants), documents to be submitted by the complainants (a copy of the decision of provisional disposition of interference with passage by the complainants) (a copy of the decision of provisional disposition of interference

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs (road access roads);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order takes into account the fact that there is no previous conviction for the reason of sentencing, the status of the defendant (Relationship with J), the circumstances leading to the crime, and the degree of damage.