However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

On February 27, 2014, at around 20:00, “A person who is a principal” used in C in front of C in Yangju-si, after having received D’s report, the police officer of the Yangju Police Station E box called “sing out” asked his personal information, and assaulted F’s face with both hand, such as “singing out” and “sing out” without any reason.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the duties of police officer F's protection measures for a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Determination of Punishment] : Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor [Determination of the area of recommendation] mitigation area / [Determination of the area of recommendation] one month to eight months / Where the degree of positive assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, it is decided as per Disposition on the grounds that there is no criminal record of the suspension of execution of imprisonment with prison labor or heavier punishment, which is positive (decision of sentence ] 4 months, and one year or more.