A. On December 10, 2017, the Plaintiff A and the Defendant were pro-Japanese, and they participated in the lock of the mother of the native in Incheon on December 10, 2017, and the Defendant went to Plaintiff A on the way while moving the lock.

In addition, repeatedly, the Defendant was in excess of the weight due to Plaintiff A’s failure to cope with the weight, and the number exceeded by the Defendant on the part of Plaintiff A’s beyond the weight.

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

Plaintiff

A, as a result of the instant accident, the part part of the clan was laid down, went to the hospital, and went to the hospital, and was subject to the diagnosis by the military after the partition certificate.

C. Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A.

[Evidence: Evidence No. 1, 2, and 4; Evidence No. 1; Evidence No. 1; Results of a request for physical appraisal to the Director of the D Hospital in this Court; facts without any dispute; the purport of the argument before oral proceedings];

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of the basis of liability, the defendant saw the plaintiff A as a long-term accident.

Since it was repeated and repeated, and the plaintiff Gap suffered the above injury, the plaintiffs are responsible for compensating for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs.

I would like to say.

B. According to the evidence as seen earlier prior to the limitation of liability, the Defendant joined several cases of Plaintiff A.

was put on.

In the meantime, two or more accidents of this case occurred while the accident of this case occurred, it seems that the plaintiff A had actively prevented and met the defendant's behavior in order to prevent the accident.

The Plaintiff’s mistake contributed to the occurrence of damages caused by the instant accident.

As such, it shall be considered in calculating the amount of damages that the defendant should compensate.

In light of all the circumstances, the defendant's liability is limited to 90% by considering the plaintiff A's error as 10%.

3. The result of calculating the scope of liability for damages shall be as shown in attached Tables 1 and 2, and the period for calculating the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but less than the last month and less than KRW 2 shall be discarded.

The amount of damages.