When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 04:00 on November 23, 2013, the Defendant sought the horses that he was suffering from the wound due to the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son

At the same time, the Defendant, “I would have to meet or reach an agreement directly because I would like to make son’s face so that I would do so.” However, while I would not respond to the son’s son’s friendly appearance F and neighbor’s view, the Defendant took a bath on several occasions, such as “I ambling, I ambling, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben, I ambre, I amben, I am amben, I amben, I am amben, I am am bit

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of each statute on witness D, F, and I’s respective legal statements;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Selection of Punishment for the Crime. Article 311 (Selection of Fine)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not have any desire for the victim at all regarding the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

In full view of the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court, the defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel is not accepted, since the defendant's abusive theory as criminal facts is recognized to have publicly insulting the victim.

The reason for sentencing does not have the same criminal record for the defendant; the content of the case in this case and the background leading to the defendant to commit the case in this case, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant and circumstances after the crime