However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, the defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Real estate lessor E, loan hub world, etc.: (a) concluded a loan agreement with a new cooperative or credit cooperative, etc., which is relatively difficult to examine documents; (b) made a loan on the basis of a false loan agreement; and (c) made it illegal; and (c) accordingly, E purchased a loan on the condition that the lessor, lessee, etc. take over the obligations of the deposit money for the lease on a deposit basis; and (d) formed a loan agreement with a third party, G, H, and I in contact with the J. of the Pyeongtaek Credit Cooperative; (c) the victim was in charge of the loan-related affairs; (d) K, L, and M, etc. as a lessor or lessee of the purchased real estate; and (e) the Defendants and the aforementioned lender were in charge of filing an application for the loan of the lease on a deposit basis of the lease agreement prepared falsely as above; and (e) the victim was in charge of preparing the loan-related internal documents as if the loan-related application was made normally; and (e) obtained approval from the president in order to obtain the loan from the union.

Defendant

A In accordance with the above public offering, at the office of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Central Credit Cooperative on September 26, 2014, the victim, who was under the joint signature of 29-gil 19,000,000,000,000 won of loans, and the loan documents, such as the loan application and loan transaction agreement, at the office of the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Central Credit Cooperative. The victim, who was under the joint signature of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 26, 2014, attached a multi-household lease agreement (Seoul Eunpyeong-gu, where real estate is located, "301,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000)