A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. On February 17, 2014, at around 08:50, the Defendant inflicted injury on the road of 20 days from the Nam-gu Busan United Nations Peace, and on the road of 20 days from the “E” shop, the Defendant inflicted on the victim’s “E” the victim’s “hump B, hump, and hump,” on the ground that the victim’s “hump, hump, and hump, hump, and hump, for approximately 21 days.”

2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), set up against the assault of the said victim A (25 years of age) at the same time and at the same place, destroyed the victim’s face by leaving the breath, and then making the victim’s face available for drinking, and thereby causing injury to the victim, such as snow, booming, etc. in the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. The Defendants: Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 257(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of detention in the workhouse: (a) considering the fact that the Defendants committed the instant crime even though they had been committed several times of the same kind of crimes in the sentencing of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; and (b) Defendant B committed the instant crime again within three days after having been sentenced to a suspended sentence due to the same crime; and (c) the said Defendants committed the instant crime, strict punishment against the Defendants is required.

However, the defendants are divided into their mistakes, the defendants do not want a mutual punishment under mutual agreement, the defendants A do not have any criminal records exceeding fines, and the defendants A have any criminal records other than the defendants' age, character, conduct and environment, motives, means and results of the crimes, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crimes, shall be determined as ordered.